Russia Hacks: its the CIA versus the FBI, and now (Apparently) Everyone...

When the CIA – a group of admitted liars and domestic propagandists, think Iraq WMD's for example – come out with a report that the russians hacked the election - in some sort of capacity, you can bet it’s fake news...

Especially when the FBI and - apparently - everyone else disagrees with you as well...

To start off, Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus, challenged Chuck Todd, host of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” on whether or not he could cite a single source that can confirm the RNC was hacked by Russian agents.

Well Tod answered

“The assessment from the CIA that the actions by the Russian government were disruptive in order to help Donald Trump,” 

He then continued,

“Does Donald Trump have confidence in America’s intelligence?” 

To which Priebus responded the obvious:

“Of course he has confidence in America’s intelligence, but we don’t have confidence in the New York Times releasing a report of unnamed sources… of some kind of study that the Washington Post said was inconclusive,”   

“The RNC was absolutely not hacked.”

So then while the liberal controlled media go on on this latest crusade, former US ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton weighed in on the topic as well.

Speaking to Fox News’ Eric Shawn on Sunday, Bolton said:

“we have to know the facts here, and it’s not at all clear to me, just viewing this and from the outside, that this hacking into the DNC (Democratic National Committee) and the RNC (Republican National Committee) computers was not a false flag operation.”

Recalling what FBI director James Comey said regarding Hillary Clinton’s “home-brewed server,” Bolton noted that while the bureau found no direct evidence of that foreign intelligence services had breached the system, he hadn’t expected them to.

Bolton then continued to say, that this this means that a “really sophisticated foreign intelligence service would not leave any cyber fingerprints, and yet people say they did leave fingerprints in the hacks regarding our election.”

to the point Bolton pointed out:

“So the question has to be asked: Why did the Russians run their smart intelligence service against Hillary’s server, but their dumb intelligence service against the election?”

A rather good question from Bolton... 

When Bolton was asked if by using the phrase “false flag,” he was implying that the US government had played a role in the hacking, Bolton said “we just don’t know.”

In other words, the former UN ambassador was probably hinting that perhaps the US government indeed could have been involved as the “intelligence community has been politicized in the Obama administration to a very significant degree.” (the quotation is Bolton actual words)

Watch the entire Bolton interview here:

But it gets better...

Former UK ambassador Craig Murray is calling the whole thing one big pile of “bullsh*t”. 

According to Murray, it is not Russia who hacked the DNC in an effort to help Donald Trump win the election, as he asserted that he met the DNC leaker and that he wasn’t Russian!

“I know who leaked them,” Murray told the Guardian. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider.”

Murray points out that the DNC emails were leaked not hacked, by an insider who was most likely upset at Clinton and the DNC rigging the primary against Bernie Sanders.

Wikileaks has also been denying the Russian angle all along. In fact, Julian Assange had alluded to the probability that the leak had been the murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich...

So is the CIA compromised? according to both Bolton, Murray and others, perhaps - which to be honest is a scary thought indeed...

To wrap it all up, watch this Fox News segment, where President-elect Trump dismisses CIA reports on Russian hack - much the the chagrin of the biased media...