Guest post by Morton A. Klein, President of the Zionist Organization of America.
Wikileaks recently exposed an email written by former White House official Stuart Eisenstadt that discussed the Obama administration’s deteriorating relationship with Israel and warned that: “There is a distinct possibility that the Administration may seek a new UN Security Council Resolution embodying the two-state, with [pre-] 1967 lines and agreed land swaps, and some vague statements about Jerusalem.”
Is President Barack Obama intending to abandon the decades of bipartisan U.S. policy of vetoing anti-Israel U.N. Security Council resolutions? Specifically, is Obama preparing to permit the UN Security Council to pass a resolution supporting or recognizing a Palestinian Arab state, and declaring Jewish communities built within it to be illegal?
The signs that this is indeed the case are numerous. President Obama is laying the groundwork to rationalize, and make palatable and understandable that he may take unprecedented unilateral actions against Israel.
Consider the following:
Consider the following:
• On October 5,
2016, Obama’s State Department “strongly condemned” Israel for approving plans
to build 98 apartment units within the existing Jewish community of Shiloh in
Samaria, for Jews who will be forcibly evicted from their homes in Amona. The existing Jewish community in Shilo which was established in 1979 and has
3,500 existing residents. The State
Department falsely claimed that Israel was approving a “significant new West
Bank Settlement,” and that this undermined a two-state solution, and “called
into question Israel’s commitment to achieving a negotiated peace.”
• The State Department’s October 5 condemnation also stated:
“with regard to the UN Security Council and any action at the UN, our position
hasn’t changed. We’re always concerned,
frankly, about one-sided resolutions or other actions that could be taken within
the UN, and we’re always going to oppose those kinds of resolutions that we
believe delegitimize … Israel and undermine its security. But we’re going to
carefully consider our future engagement, if and when we reach that point, and
determine how to most effectively pursue and advance the objective that we all
at least claim to share, which is that of achieving a negotiated two-state
solution.” [emphasis added].
Despite being prefaced with a line about the U.S. position
being unchanged, the State Department’s “reconsideration” statement, on top of
the unusually harsh language of condemnation for a mere announcement of program
of residential construction in an existing Jewish community, is more than a
hint as to the course President Obama may take.
• Shockingly, the
same day, the Obama administration questioned whether Israel is a
“friend.” White House spokesman Josh
Ernest reiterated the State Department’s unfounded criticism of Israel, wrongly
stating on October 5 that “we did receive public assurances from Israel that
contradict this announcement, I guess when we’re talking about how good friends
treat one another, that’s a source of serious concern as well.”
• The media
promptly provided further evidence of Obama’s intentions to overturn longstanding
U.S. policy. On the day of the
administration’s statements (October 5, 2016), the same “echo chamber” method
that Obama aide Ben Rhodes boasted of using to promote the Iran deal – namely,
using the media to promote the administration’s agenda – was in full
swing. A New York Timesarticle that day
quoted former Obama Administration peace negotiator, Martin Indyk, saying: “At
a certain point … the Administration may well decide that there needs to be
consequences for what it now sees as an effort to close off the two-state
solution.”
• And on October 6,
2016, a New York Times editorial entitled “At the Boiling Point With Israel,”
parroted the State Department’s false accusations against Israel, and called
for Mr. Obama to “lead the Security Council to put its authority behind a
resolution to support a two-state solution.”
• During his
September 30, 2016 speech eulogizing Shimon Peres, Obama falsely implied that
Israel is “enslaving” Palestinian Arabs.
Obama quoted the leftwing Peres as saying, “The Jewish people weren’t
born to rule another people” and “we are against slaves and masters.” Obama also called Israeli’s founding
“flawed.”
• Later the same
day, after the White House official transcript of Obama’s eulogy listed
“Jerusalem, Israel” as the speech’s and burial’s location, the White House
crossed out “Israel.”
• On September 9,
2016, Obama’s State Department wrongly criticized Israeli Prime Minister
Netanyahu’s valid and accurate explanation that the Palestinian Arab
leadership’s repeated demand for a state with “no Jews” constituted “ethnic
cleansing.”
In sum, there are good reasons to believe that the ground is
being prepared for a major change of US policy, and major U.S. betrayal of
Israel at the UN, perhaps after the November elections.
Obama’s refusal to veto a potential UN Resolution
unilaterally establishing or laying out borders or other parameters for a
Palestinian Arab State would sabotage any chance of Israel/Palestinian
negotiations and peace.
As President Lyndon Johnson wisely said: “We are not the
ones to say where other nations should draw lines between them that will assure
each the greatest security. . . . [L]ines must be agreed to by the neighbors
involved.”
The U.S. Congress can and should play a decisive role here:
it can pass legislation mandating a cut-off of U.S. funding for the UN and/or
the Palestinian Authority if the Obama administration permits a Palestinian
state resolution to pass in the Security Council. This could stop a devastating
UN resolution, which will endanger the only tiny Jewish State in the world and
its eight million inhabitants.
Morton A. Klein is the President of the Zionist Organization
of America.
Editors note:
a Vote for Hillary will be a continuation of these failed policies which contineu to put Israel and the entire middle east at risk of war...
On November 8th Vote Trump!
No comments:
Post a Comment